 |
 |
 |
 |
| Hunter PGJ-04-V - PGJ 4" Adjustable Arc Rotor Sprinkler w/Check Valve |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Features
- All the features and benefits of the PGP, scaled down to fit typical spray applications.
- A rack of easy-to-install-and-change, water-efficient nozzles, just like PGP. Easy adjustment from the top of the sprinkler, just like PGP. The safety and durability of a rubber cover, just like PGP. The PGJ is a chip off the ol' block, in essence a PGP junior. Hunter has scaled down the world's top-selling sprinkler exclusively for use in applications that typically call for a spray but where it's now possible to have all the benefits of a rotor. The PGJ is capable of working in tandem with larger rotors to combine big and small areas in a single zone, offering a convenience and efficiency that sprays do not. With PGJ, fewer heads perform more efficient work for a more economical price.
- Features and Benefits
- Radius adjustment screw
- Allows fine tuning of spray, ensures positive nozzle retention, can't be lost
- Protective rubber cover
- Keeps debris out
- 40° - 360° adjustable arc
- Easily adjustable from top of sprinkler, up, down, wet or dry
- Water-lubricated gear drive
- Time proven, reliable rotation, year after year
- Variable stator
- Keeps rotation speed consistent regardless of nozzle size or pressure
- Extra large filter screen
- Traps more debris without clogging
- Optional factory-installed drain check valve
- Prevents wet spots, caused by low head drainage
- When your landscape has mid-range zones that are long and narrow, the obvious choice would be to install sprays. Yet, the intelligent choice would be a rotor specifically designed to fit this kind of landscape. With the scaled-down-in-size PGJ, two rows of rotors can do the same job as three rows of spray heads. Because PGJ rotors can run on the same zone as other rotary sprinklers, they require fewer valves and stations, and, in turn, less trenching, piping and labor. It all adds up to less installation time and lower installation costs (as well as lower watering costs)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |

|